McGraw-Hill OnlineMcGraw-Hill Higher EducationLearning Center
Student Center | Instructor Center | Information Center | Home
Career Opportunities
Lab Exercises
ESP Essential Study Partner
Simple Animations
Animations & Quizzing
Government Contacts
How to Write a Term Paper
Chart of Common Elements
The Metric System
BioCourse.com
Regional Perspectives
Global Issues Map
Glossary A-D
Glossary E-L
Glossary M-R
Glossary S-Z
Chapter Overview
Be Alert Boxes
Key Term Flashcards
Practice Quizzing
Essay Quiz
Chapter Web Links
Chapter Summary
Additional Readings
Feedback
Help Center


Environmental Science: A Global Concern, 7/e
William P. Cunningham, University of Minnesota
Mary Ann Cunningham, Vassar College
Barbara Woodworth Saigo, St. Cloud State University

Conventional Energy

Chapter Summary

Energy is the capacity to do work. Power is the rate of doing work. Worldwide, nearly 85 percent of all commercial energy is generated by fossil fuels, about 36 percent coming from petroleum. Next are coal, with 28 percent, and natural gas (methane), with 23 percent. Petroleum and natural gas were not used in large quantities until the beginning of this century, but supplies are already running low. Coal supplies will last several more centuries at present rates of usage, but it appears that the fossil fuel age will have been a rather short episode in the total history of humans. Nuclear power provides almost 8 percent of all commercial energy but about 20 percent of the electricity in the United States.

Energy is essential for most activities of modern society. Its use generally correlates with standard of living, but there are striking differences between energy use per capita in countries with relatively equal standards of living. The United States, for instance, consumes nearly twice as much energy per person as does Switzerland, which is higher in many categories that measure quality of life. This difference is based partly on level of industrialization and partly on policies, attitudes, and traditions in the United States that encourage extravagant or wasteful energy use.

The environmental damage caused by mining, shipping, processing, and using fossil fuels may necessitate cutting back on our use of these energy sources. Coal is an especially dirty and dangerous fuel, at least as we currently obtain and use it. Some new coal treatment methods remove contaminants, reduce emissions, and make its use more efficient (so less will be used). Coal combustion is a major source of acid precipitation that is suspected of being a significant cause of environmental damage in many areas. We now recognize that CO2 buildup in the atmosphere has the potential to trap heat and raise the earth’s temperature to catastrophic levels.

Nuclear energy offers an alternative to many of the environmental and social costs of fossil fuels, but it introduces serious problems of its own. In the 1950s, there was great hope that these problems would be overcome and that nuclear power plants would provide energy “too cheap to meter.” Recently, however, much of that optimism has been waning. No new reactors have been started in the United States since 1975. Many countries are closing down existing nuclear power plants, and a growing number have pledged to remain or become “nuclear-free.”

The greatest worry about nuclear power is the danger of accidents that release hazardous radioactive materials into the environment. Several accidents, most notably the “meltdown” at the Chernobyl plant in the Soviet Ukraine in 1986, have convinced many people that this technology is too risky to pursue.

Other major worries about nuclear power include where to put the waste products of the nuclear fuel cycle and how to ensure that it will remain safely contained for the thousands of years required for “decay” of the radioisotopes to nonhazardous levels. Yucca Mountain, Nevada, was chosen for a high-level waste repository, but many experts believe that burying these toxic residues in nonretrievable storage is a mistake.

Nuclear fusion occurs when atoms are forced together in order to create new, more massive atoms. If fusion actions could be created under controlled conditions in a power plant, they might provide an essentially unlimited source of energy that would avoid many of the worst problems of both fossil fuels and fission-based nuclear power. So far, however, no one has been able to sustain controlled fusion reactions that produce more energy than they consume. It remains to be seen whether this will ever be possible, and whether other unforeseen problems will arise if it does become a reality.

None of our current major energy sources appear to offer security in terms of stable supply or environmental considerations. Neither coal nor nuclear power is a good long-term energy source with our present level of technology. We urgently need to develop alternative sources of sustainable energy.