| Fundamentals of Investment Management, 7/e Geoffrey A. Hirt,
DePaul University Stanley B. Block,
Texas Christian University
Measuring Risks and Returns of Portfolio Managers
Stock Investor Pro QuestionsPlease use the AAII Stock Investor Pro to complete the following exercises.
1.a. Growth stocks are often thought of as having more risk than income
stocks. Identify those companies, using the Screen Editor, whose compound
growth rate in earnings over the last five years (EPS-Growth 5yr)
is greater than 100 percent (100%). Also require that earnings have been
positive in each of the last three years, so that EPS Y1 _ 0, EPS Y2 _ 0,
and EPS Y3 _ 0. b. Create a View using the View Editor that shows the compound growth
rate in earnings for the past five years (EPS-Growth 5yr), the current dividend
yield (Yield), and beta and use it to analyze the companies identified
in exercise 1a. c. Identify income companies, using the Screen Editor, that have a dividend
yield (Yield) greater than seven percent (7%). Again, require that earnings
have been positive in each of the last three years, so that EPS Y1 _ 0, EPS
Y2 _ 0, and EPS Y3 _ 0. d. Create a View as described in exercise 1b and use it to analyze the companies
identified in exercise 1c. e. Analyze the reports for these growth and income companies and comment
on your observations. In particular, compare the average beta for
the growth portfolio to that of the income portfolio (do so by creating
a View using the View Editor with beta) and run Statistical Summary
reports using this View for both portfolios. 2.a. Sort the Stock Investor Pro database in ascending order by beta. How
many of the companies do not have a beta available? Can you determine
why their beta is unavailable? b. How many companies have a negative beta? What is the range for negative
betas? c. Because there are relatively few negative-beta companies, would you expect
the demand for these stocks to be strong or weak among institutional
portfolio managers? d. Compare the average level of institutional holdings for stocks with betas
below _3.0 and greater than _1.1 versus those with betas under 1.0 and
greater than 2.99. Common on your findings. |
|