Charles Krauthammer, "Of Headless Mice...And Men" Charles Krauthammer (1950- ) was born in New York City and earned
a B.A. from McGill University in 1970 and an M.D. from Harvard University
in 1975. He's been a psychiatrist in both private and public practice,
a speechwriter for Vice-President Walter Mondale, an editor at The
New Republic, a monthly essayist for Time magazine, and a syndicated
columnist for the Washington Post. Krauthammer's written a book
of essays called Cutting Edges: Making Sense of the Eighties (1985),
and has contributed to several others. His work also appears in periodicals
such as The Weekly Standard, the ChicagoTribune,
and The Wilson Quarterly. In 1987 he won the Pulitzer Prize for
his social and political commentary. "Of Headless Mice...And Men"
was first published in 1998 in Time. |
QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION |
CONTENT - Who is Dolly?
- What happened to the four headless mice that were born?
- What use does Krauthammer see for headless mice and other headless
animals?
- Discuss the technical hurdles in cloning a headless human.
- What does the word draconian mean?
- When does the author want human cloning stopped?
- What is the major problem Krauthammer points out about a human
clone?
STRATEGY AND STYLE - The author makes several literary allusions in this piece. One
is to Frankenstein and two others are to Brave New World.
Look up the latter novel's plot if it isn't familiar. What do these
allusions do to emphasize the author's objections to cloning?
- What is the author's argument here? What kinds of support does
he use to bolster his argument? Do you find his support persuasive?
- Take a look at the use of quotation marks around the word alive
in paragraphs four and five. How can you relate this usage to the author's
views of cloning? Whose voices are represented? What do you make of
the repetition?
|
ENGAGING THE TEXT |
- How closely have you followed the debates about cloning? How might
this level of information have affected your reading here?
- What do you feel about human cloning? If you're against it, might
your feelings change if you or a loved one needed a scarce organ? If
you're for it, why?
|
SUGGESTIONS FOR SUSTAINED WRITING |
- The author suggests a temporal relationship between ethical questions
and technological problems. That is, once the former are overcome, the
latter will be solved in time. Using your reading and what you know
about science, write an essay about these two things. What's the relationship
between ethics and technical breakthroughs in science?
- Krauthammer writes, "Human beings are ends, not means."
Form that statement into a thesis and write an essay about the value
of human life.
|
FOR FURTHER RESEARCH |
Krauthammer, at the time of this writing, states that U.S. politicians
have not done enough to stop human cloning. Do some research to find out
what has been done in the years between 1998 and the present. Have the
changes this author calls for been implemented? Has he written anything
further on the subject? |
WEB CONNECTION |
Would you like to do some more research on cloning farms and other related
issues? This page
from the National Right to Life Committee has links to dozens of documents
about cloning, and is a great place to start your research. |
LINKS |
Biographical This biography
from the Washington Post has a photo of Krauthammer and a few
links. The Harry Walker Agency, this author's speaking agent, posted this
biography
and photo of Krauthammer. What does this one mention that the one above
doesn't? What accounts for the difference, do you think?
Bibliographical The Washington Post put up this page
with links to a whole bunch of recent columns by this author. The topics
covered range from cloning to baseball to Enron to the "Clinton
Effect." The Jerusalem Post conducted a radio interview with Krauthammer
in late 2001. Click here
tolisten to it.
Cultural Looking for a way to get a general overview of some issues relating
to technology? Try this directory
from Google.com. Does the amount of entries online surprise you? Why
or why not? Ready for an essay on a closely related topic? Here's one
by Leo Marx called "Does Technology Mean Progress?" How can
you link Marx's ideas to the reading you just finished? Predicting the nature of science's trajectory can be a dicey business.
Take a look a these remarks
about computers made over the last few decades—from highly reputable
sources—and see how much sense they make right now. What, do you think,
accounts for the nature of these predictions? Can such things be avoided?
|