Power of government must be equal to its responsibilities
Federalism was the result of political bargaining
Federalism is not a "fixed principle" but has changed with the times
Contemporary federalism tilts toward national authority
Federalism: National and State Sovereignty
Introduction
Federalism divided sovereignty (the ultimate authority to govern) between national and state governments
Until 1787, United States had been a confederacy (states had sovereignty)
The Constitutional convention devised a governing system that came to be known as federalism.
A unitary system vests sovereignty solely in the national government
The Argument for Federalism
Protecting Liberty
Moderating the Power of Government
Strengthening the Union
The Powers of the Nation
Enumerated Powers-specifically given to national government
Seventeen powers listed in Article I, Section 8
Article VI grants supremacy clause (national law is supreme to states)
Implied Powers-powers of the national government not specifically granted to it
Stem from "necessary and proper clause" or elastic clause
Important so as not to restrict government's adaptation to change
The Powers of the States
Antifederalists feared consequences of a strong national government
Madison observed that states could retain many governing functions
Tenth Amendment grants reserved powers to the states
Reserved Powers: the authority of the states
Federalism in Historical Perspective
Introduction
Framers avoided details; brief phrases gave government flexibility
Constitution does not define difference between interstate and intrastate commerce
An Indestructible Union (1789-1865)
The Nationalist View: McCulloch v.Maryland (1819)
Jefferson and Hamilton clashed over issue of a national bank
John Marshall ruled in favor of the bank (implied powers)
Marshall also strengthened supremacy clause (Maryland could not tax the national bank)
The States' Rights View: The Dred Scott Decision (1857)
Calhoun's "nullification doctrine"
The Supreme Court ruled that slaves were "property" and and could not sue for their freedom
Lincoln campaigned for gradual abolition of slavery
Dual Federalism and Laissez-Faire Capitalism (1865-1937)
Dual federalism assumed a precise state-federal separation of powers
Industrial revolution raised questions about dual federalism
The Fourteenth Amendment and State Discretion
Fourteenth Amendment intended to protect citizens from discrimination by state governments
Supreme Court rulings undermined the amendment
Judicial Protection of Business
In the 19th Century, the Supreme Court was dominated by adherents of the doctrine of laissez-faire capitalism
Court narrowly interpreted commerce power (weakened regulation)
In Hammer v.Dagenhart (1918), Court ruled that child labor was a state matter
National Authority Prevails
The Great Depression demonstrated that America had a national and interdependent economy
After FDR's "court-packing plan," theCourt began supporting New Deal
Toward National Citizenship
Idea that all Americans are equal in their rights has become pervasive
Important differences remain in citizens' rights, privileges, immunities
Federalism Today
Introduction
Since the 1930's, the relation of the nation to the states has changed fundamentally
Two major trends changing American federalism
a long term expansion of national authority, beginning in the 1930's and for the next half century
a more recent trend of contraction of national authority know as "devolution"
Interdependency and Intergovernmental Relations
Economy is now national and international in scope
Cooperative federalism-a "marble cake," not a " layer cake"
Levels of government now cooperate more than ever-before
Government Revenues and Intergovernmental Relations
Fiscal Federalism-the expenditure of federal funds on programs that run in partthrough state and local government
Categorical and Block Grants
Categorical grants are the more restrictive; they can be used only for a designated activity
Block grants are less restrictive; the federal government specifies the general area in which the funds must be used, but state and local government can select specific uses
A New Federalism: Devolution
Budgetary Pressures and Public Opinion
Federal budget pressures led to unfunded mandates and cuts in grants to states and localities
The Republican Revolution
Republican-controlled Congress pushed for greater state/local control, fewer unfunded mandates
Devolution, Judicial Style
The Public's Influence: Setting the Boundaries of Federal-State Power
FDR's welfare and public jobprograms attracted public support
LBJ's Great Society programs reflected Americans' desire for government services
The public's role in defining the boundaries between federal and state power would come as no surprise to the Framers of the Constitution