Site MapHelpFeedbackImportance of Ethics
Importance of Ethics
(See related pages)

<a onClick="window.open('/olcweb/cgi/pluginpop.cgi?it=jpg::::/sites/dl/free/0072846003/lo10.jpg','popWin', 'width=NaN,height=NaN,resizable,scrollbars');" href="#"><img valign="absmiddle" height="16" width="16" border="0" src="/olcweb/styles/shared/linkicons/image.gif"> (K)</a>
Explain the importance of ethics to the accounting profession.

Ethics is the lifeblood of the accounting profession. An ethical breach by a few unscrupulous partners and employees in the Houston office of Arthur Andersen led to the demise of this huge international accounting firm (see the Reality Bytes side bar for more details). Thousands of people lost their jobs and hundreds of millions of dollars of damages were incurred. This debacle stands as convincing evidence of the importance of ethical conduct to the accounting profession.

The importance of ethical conduct is universally recognized by accountants. All the major professional accounting organizations require their members to follow formal codes of ethical conduct. The underlying principles of the Code of Professional ConductA set of guidelines established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) to promote high ethical conduct among its membership.6 adopted by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants are summarized in Exhibit 1.7. Other codes follow similar principles.

Exhibit 1.7Principles of AICPA Code of Professional Conduct

Article I Responsibilities

In carrying out their responsibilities as professionals, members should exercise sensitive professional and moral judgments in all their activities.

Article II The Public Interest

Members should accept the obligation to act in a way that will serve the public interest, honor the public trust, and demonstrate commitment to professionalism.

Article III Integrity

To maintain and broaden public confidence, members should perform all professional responsibilities with the highest sense of integrity.

Article IV Objectivity and Independence

A member should maintain objectivity and be free of conflicts of interest in discharging professional responsibilities. A member in public practice should be independent in fact and appearance when providing auditing and other attestation services.

Article V Due Care

A member should observe the profession’s technical and ethical standards, strive continually to improve competence and the quality of services, and discharge professional responsibility to the best of the member’s ability.

Article VI Scope and Nature of Services

A member in public practice should observe the principles of the Code of Professional Conduct in determining the scope and nature of services to be provided.

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Codes of ethics cannot deter all unethical behavior. The massive surprise bankruptcies of Enron in late 2001 and WorldCom several months later suggested major audit failures on the part of the independent auditors. An audit failure means a company’s auditor does not detect, or fails to report, that the company’s financial reports are not in compliance with GAAP. The audit failures at Enron, WorldCom, and others prompted Congress to pass the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which became effective on July 30, 2002. The provisions of this legislation are complex, and their full effects will not be known for some time. However, it is clear that the act has tightened the rules governing auditors’ independence.

Prior to Sarbanes-Oxley, independent auditors often provided nonaudit services, such as installing computer systems, for their audit clients. The fees they earned for these services sometimes greatly exceeded the fees charged for the audit itself. This practice had been questioned prior to the audit failures at Enron and WorldCom. Critics felt the independent audit firm was subject to pressure from the company to conduct a less rigorous audit, or risk losing lucrative nonaudit work. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act prohibits auditors from providing most types of nonaudit services to companies they audit.

Another provision of Sarbanes-Oxley clarifies the legal responsibility that company management has for a company’s financial reports. The company’s chief executive officer (CEO) and chief financial officer (CFO) must certify in writing that they have reviewed the financial reports being issued, and that the reports present fairly the company’s financial status. An executive who falsely certifies the company’s financial reports is subject to significant fines and imprisonment.

Additional details of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act are presented in Chapters 11 and 14. Further discussion of the problems at WorldCom and Enron are presented in Chapters 6 and 10, respectively.

Common Features of Ethical Misconduct

People who become involved in unethical or criminal behavior usually do so unexpectedly. They start with small indiscretions that evolve gradually into more serious violations of trust. To reduce the incidence of unethical or illegal conduct, business persons must be aware of conditions that lead to trust violations. To increase awareness, Donald Cressey studied hundreds of criminal cases to identify the primary factors behind ethical misconduct. Cressey found three factors common to all cases: (1) the existence of a nonsharable problem, (2) the presence of an opportunity, and (3) the capacity for rationalization.7

REALITY BYTES 

Independent auditors are primarily responsible to the investing public, not to the company that hires and pays them. In 2002 numerous accounting scandals involving some very large public companies caused investors to question whether or not the external auditors really were independent. The public learned that external audit firms were often also serving as consultants to the companies they audited. The fees earned for consulting services were sometimes significantly higher than the fees earned for auditing the same company. These arrangements caused many people, including members of Congress, to doubt that auditors would take a tough stance with a company’s management over financial reporting issues if doing so might threaten future consulting fees.

No situation demonstrated this concern more than that of Enron. The well-publicized accounting problems that led to Enron’s downfall were equally devastating for its auditor, Arthur Andersen. Within six months after Enron’s troubles became public knowledge, Arthur Andersen lost over half its public company audit clients and almost two-thirds of its employees. Further, Andersen was convicted of obstruction of justice by a Houston jury and was told by the SEC that it could no longer audit public companies. The partner in charge of the Enron audit was fired and pled guilty to obstruction of justice charges; the previous year, his compensation exceeded $1 million.

In addition to the consequences mentioned above, civil lawsuits were filed against Arthur Andersen, and legal experts believe its partners, even those not involved in the Enron audit, will likely be held personally liable for any damages resulting from inadequate audits. Congress has given CPAs a legal monopoly to provide independent audits for public companies. However, their protected status does not shelter them from the consequences of their actions. As the Enron case demonstrates, when CPAs fail, they are held to a high and costly standard.

<a onClick="window.open('/olcweb/cgi/pluginpop.cgi?it=jpg::::/sites/dl/free/0072846003/edm46003_p0105.jpg','popWin', 'width=NaN,height=NaN,resizable,scrollbars');" href="#"><img valign="absmiddle" height="16" width="16" border="0" src="/olcweb/styles/shared/linkicons/image.gif"> (K)</a>
Reuters/Corbis

As the term implies, a nonsharable problem is one that must be kept secret. Individuals differ about what they keep to themselves. Consider two responses to the problem of an imminent business failure. One person may feel so ashamed that he or she cannot discuss the problem with anyone. Another person in the same situation may want to talk to anyone, even a stranger, in the hope of getting help. Other nonsharable problems include personal vices such as drug addiction, gambling, and promiscuity. Cressey’s findings suggest that the person who is inclined toward secrecy is more likely to accept an unethical or illegal solution. In other words, the perceived need for secrecy increases vulnerability.

Accountants establish policies and procedures designed to reduce opportunities for fraud. These policies and procedures are commonly called internal controlsA company's policies and procedures designed to reduce the opportunity for fraud and to provide reasonable assurance that its objectives will be accomplished.. Specific internal control procedures are tailored to meet the individual needs of particular businesses. For example, banks use vaults to protect cash, but universities have little use for this type of equipment. Chapter 6 discusses internal control procedures in more detail. At this point, simply recognize that accountants are aware of the need to reduce opportunities for unethical and criminal activities.

Few individuals think of themselves as dishonest, so they develop rationalizations to justify their misconduct. Cressey found a significant number of embezzlers who contended they were only “borrowing the money,” even after being convicted and sentenced to jail. Common rationalizations include peer pressure, loyalty to unscrupulous superiors, family needs, revenge, and a sense of entitlement. To avoid involvement in ethical misconduct, accountants must develop a strong sense of personal responsibility. They cannot allow themselves to blame other people or unfair circumstances for their problems. They must learn to hold themselves personally accountable for their actions.

Ethical misconduct is a serious offense in the accounting profession. A single mistake can destroy an accounting career. If you commit a white-collar crime, you normally lose the opportunity to hold a white-collar job. Second chances are rarely granted; it is extremely important that you learn how to recognize and avoid the common features of ethical misconduct. To help you prepare for the real-world situations you are likely to encounter, we include ethical dilemmas in the end-of-chapter materials. When working with these dilemmas, try to identify the (1) secret, (2) opportunity, and (3) rationalization associated with the particular ethical situation described. If you are not an ethical person, accounting is not the career for you.


Exercises  1-26A, 1-26B

Problems  1-35A, 1-35B



6 American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Inc. (AICPA), Code of Professional Conduct (New York: AICPA, 1992).
7 D. R. Cressey, Other People’s Money (Montclair, NJ: Paterson Smith, 1973).








Fundamentals of FinManOnline Learning Center

Home > Chapter 1 > Importance of Ethics