Site MapHelpFeedbackWhere Historians Disagree
Where Historians Disagree
(See related pages)

Chapter One: The Meeting of Cultures

Where Historians Disagree - The American Population before Columbus

No one knows how many people lived in the Americas in the centuries before Columbus. But scholars, and others, have spent more than a century debating the question. Interest in this question survives because the debate over the pre-Columbian population is closely connected to the much larger debate over the consequences of European settlement of the Western Hemisphere.

Throughout the nineteenth century, Native Americans spoke often of the great days before Columbus when there were many more people in their tribes. The painter and ethnographer George Catlin, who spent much time among the tribes in the 1830s, listened to these oral legends and estimated that there had been 16 million Indians in North America before the Europeans came. Other white Americans dismissed such claims as preposterous, insisting that Indian civilization was far too primitive ever to have sustained a population even as large as a million.

In 1928, James Mooney, an ethnologist at the Smithsonian Institution, drawing from early accounts of soldiers and missionaries in the sixteenth century, came up with the implausibly precise figure of 1.15 million natives who lived north of Mexico in the early sixteenth century. That was a larger figure than nineteenth-century writers had suggested, but still much smaller than the Indians themselves claimed. A few years later, the anthropologist Alfred Kroeber used some of Mooney's methods to come up with an estimate considerably larger than Mooney's, but much lower than Catlin's. He concluded in 1934 that there were 8.4 million people in the Americas in 1492, half in North America and half in the Caribbean and South America.

These low early estimates reflected an assumption that the arrival of the Europeans did not much reduce the native population. But in the 1960s and 1970s, scholars discovered that the early tribes had been catastrophically decimated by European plagues not long after the arrival of Columbus--that the numbers Europeans observed even in the late 1500s were already dramatically smaller than the numbers in 1492. Historians such as William McNeill in 1976 and Alfred Crosby a decade later produced powerful accounts of the near extinction of some tribes and the dramatic depopulation of others in a pestilential holocaust with few parallels in history.

The belief that the native population was much larger in 1492 than it was a few decades later has helped spur much larger estimates of how many people were in America before Columbus. Henry Dobyns, an anthropologist, claimed in 1966 that there were between 10 and 12 million people north of Mexico in 1492, and between 90 and 112 million in all of the Americas. No subsequent scholar has made so high a claim, but most subsequent estimates have been much closer to Dobyn's than to Kroeber's. The geographer William M. Denevan, for example, argued in 1976 that the American population in 1492 was around 55 million and that the population north of Mexico was under 4 million. These are among the lowest of modern estimates, but still dramatically higher than the nineteenth-century numbers.

The vehemence with which scholars, and at times the larger public, have debated these figures does not stem solely from the difficulty inherent in the effort to determine population size. It is also because the debate over the population is part of the debate over whether the arrival of Columbus--and the millions of Europeans who followed him--was a great advance in the history of civilization or an unparalleled catastrophe that virtually exterminated a large and flourishing native population. How to balance the many achievements of European civilization in the New World after 1492 against the terrible destruction of native peoples that accompanied it is, in the end, less a historical question, perhaps, than a moral one.

http://muweb.millersville.edu/~columbus/data/ant/BEGLEY01.ANT - The First Americans

http://www.centerfirstamericans.com/mt.html?a=60 - The Baja Connection

1
Read the Newsweek article on "The First Americans" and the "Baja Connection" summary at the Center for the Study of First Americans. Summarize briefly the varying arguments on the arrival of Native Americans to the New World. Do you find one more appealing or persuasive than the others?

http://muweb.millersville.edu/~columbus/data/ant/KEEGAN08.ANT - Demographics of Hispaniola

http://researchnews.osu.edu/archive/humhelth.htm - On Native American Health before Columbus

2
Read the articles on the demographics of Columbian Hispaniola and the recent studies of Native American health before Columbus. Do these studies suggest that the number of pre-Columbian Native Americans should be revised upward or downward?

http://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/documents/documents_p2.cfm?doc=408 - First Encounters

http://edweb.tusd.k12.az.us/uhs/APUSH/1st%20Sem/Articles%20Semester%201/Artiles%20Semester%201/Zinn%20Chpt%201.htm - Howard Zinn, "A People's History of the United States," Chapter One

3
Using the sources above, evaluate the impact of Columbus's arrival on the demographics, health, trade, and cultures of New World residents.







The Unfinished Nation: BriefOnline Learning Center

Home > Chapter 1 > Where Historians Disagree