Site MapHelpFeedbackChapter Quiz
Chapter Quiz
(See related pages)

1
Common carriers and innkeepers are usually held to an extremely high duty of care.
A)True
B)False
2
Property owners are usually only required to warn licensees of dangerous on-premises conditions that they are likely to discover.
A)True
B)False
3
An individual who did not intend to do harm may still be held strictly liable.
A)True
B)False
4
Contributory negligence is the plaintiff's failure to exercise reasonable care for her own safety.
A)True
B)False
5
Mental deficiencies ordinarily do not relieve a person from the duty to conform to the normal reasonable person standard.
A)True
B)False
6
In order to win a negligence suit, a plaintiff must prove:
A)breach of duty.
B)actual injury.
C)causation.
D)all of the above
7
Alan is an invitee on Paul's land. Therefore, Paul owes Alan a duty:
A)to exercise reasonable care to protect him against dangerous on-premises conditions that Paul knows about, or reasonably should know about.
B)only to warn him of dangerous on-premises conditions that he is not likely to discover.
C)only not to willfully and wantonly injure him on the property.
D)none of the above
8
Which of the following is not an issue regarding causation?
A)Was there actual causation between breach and injury?
B)Did the defendant intend to do harm?
C)Was the breach a proximate cause of the injury?
D)What was the effect of any intervening force arising after the breach and helping to cause the injury?
9
Which of the following is not a defense to a negligence claim?
A)contributory negligence
B)comparative negligence
C)last clear chance
D)assumption of risk
10
Under which of the following situations does strict liability apply?
A)keeping naturally dangerous wild animals
B)manufacture or sale of defective and unreasonably dangerous products
C)both A and B
D)neither A nor B







Business LawOnline Learning Center

Home > Chapter 7 > Multiple Choice Quiz