Site MapHelpFeedbackChapter Outline
Chapter Outline



  • Introduction: Stone Tools and Human Behavior
    • Simple stone tools are the earliest human artifacts that archaeologists study.
      • Small cobbles were first broken to produce sharp edges in Africa between 3 and 2 million years ago.
      • Prior to the introduction of cast metals about 5000 years ago, most tools with cutting edges were made of stone.
      • Stone tools were sometimes works of art and important symbols of status.
    • Sharp fragments of stone are perhaps the most common prehistoric artifacts on earth.
      • The earliest worked pieces of stone have been found in East Africa dating to 2.6 million years ago.
      • Our ancient ancestors may also have used pieces of wood or bone for tools, but these have not survived.
    • Stone can be shaped in a variety of ways.
      • The technique for making stone tools by intentionally removing a series of flakes is called flaking or knapping.
      • Archaeologists often refer to shaped stone artifacts as lithics, or lithic artifacts.

  • Fracture Mechanics and Raw Material
    • Fracture mechanics is the concept used to describe how materials break.
      • The key to making stone tools is to use a raw material that will break in a predictable way and produce a sharp edge.
      • The makers of stone tools sought hard, fine-grained, crystalline rocks.
      • The most common materials used were a form of cryptocrystalline quartz including basalt, obsidian jasper, quartzite, chert, and flint.
      • A piece of raw material for making stone tools is usually called a nodule or core.
    • Flint, or chert, was the type most often used prehistorically.
      • The term chert is commonly used in North America.
      • The term flint is more commonly used for this material throughout the Old World.
      • Predictable fracture is the important characteristic of this material so that desired shapes can be achieved by flaking.
    • Because of the cone of fracture and the nature of the material itself, flakes have a number of distinctive characteristics.
      • The place where force was applied to remove the flake is called the striking platform.
      • The outer surface of the flake is called the dorsal surface.
      • The inner, fresh surface of the flake itself is called the bulbar, or ventral, surface.

  • Making Stone Tools
    • A flake can be removed from core by either a blow or pressure.
      • The technique of striking stone to remove a flake is called percussion.
      • Pressure flaking is the term used to describe removals made by pressing a point into the edge of a core.
    • Percussion can be done using a hard hammer, hammer and anvil, or soft hammer.
      • The term hard hammer refers to the use of a hammer of equal or greater hardness than the core.
      • The hammer and anvil method is performed when the core is held in the hand and struck against a rock fixed in the ground.
      • Soft hammer means the use of a hammer of lighter, softer material, usually antler, bone, or even wood.
      • Percussion can be direct or indirect.
    • Pressure flaking involves the use of a pointed tool to press on the edge of a core to remove very long, narrow flakes.
      • Usually of antler or bone was used.
      • Copper was sometimes used for this pointed tool as well.
    • A distinction is made between flakes and blades.
      • Blades are simply long, narrow flakes.
      • Blades can be removed by direct or indirect percussion.
      • Blades were invented rather late in the Paleolithic period.
      • Two kinds of blades can be identified, hard hammer and soft hammer blades.
    • Tools are often separated as core tools or flake tools.
      • Another distinction is made between unifacial tools or bifacial tools.
      • Bifacial tools are often pointed implements like projectile points.
    • Tools are often intentionally shaped to a specific form by secondary flaking.
      • The technique for further shaping flakes, blades, and other pieces into specific forms is called retouching.
      • Blades are commonly retouched into a variety of shapes.

  • Making Sense of Stone Tools
    • There are many ways to study the results of prehistoric stone tool production.
      • Experimental studies are common.
      • Typology is the conventional approach to classifying stone tools.
      • Studies of the process of making stone tools often involve a concept or method known as the chaîne opératoire.
      • Microwear analysis is one of the more effective techniques used for studying how lithic artifacts were used.
    • After the stone artifacts have been cleaned and numbered, the process of sorting, classifying, measuring and analysis begins.
      • The initial sorting is often based on the basic technological types of core and flake and tools.
      • It is often necessary to draw stone tools in order to illustrate the characteristics of the artifact and the details of manufacture and use.
      • Today, the combination of laser and photo technology is used.
    • Typology
      • A hand axe is a large core tool with a distinctive shape that is pointed at one end and rounded at the other.
        • Functionally, the hand axe was an all-purpose implement.
        • Stylistically, there are distinctive types of hand axes that show regional differences in East Africa.
        • Hand axe production changed over time as soft hammer flaking was incorporated into the process.
      • The set of stone tools from a site is known as a lithic assemblage.
        • Assemblages of lithic artifacts from a particular time period are characteristic of archaeological cultures.
      • Artifact types have changed over time.
        • The Acheulean assemblages of the Lower Paleolithic are characterized by hand axes and their close relatives.
        • The Middle Paleolithic assemblage is distinguished by a multitude of flake tools, scrapers, burins, points, along with a few hand axes and other bifacial tools.
        • Blade technology characterizes the Upper Paleolithic, after 40,000 years ago.
      • There are striking differences between the artifact types in the New World and the Old World.
        • Most artifacts in the early prehistory of the New World were bifaces.
        • They were largely in the form of projectile points for spears and later for the bow and arrow.
        • Most of the unifacial artifacts from the Archaic and Woodland periods are irregular in appearance.
        • Flakes predominate in New World industries.
    • Chaîne Opératoire
      • The French term, chaîne opératoire, refers to the steps in the process of production.
        • The chaîne opératoire is defined by the different stages of production from the acquisition of raw material to the final abandonment of the objects.
        • Such studies focus on the waste material, on refitting, on human motor abilities and skills, knowledge, and experience as well as the end products of the process (tools).
      • The life history of a lithic artifact involves four major stages: the procurement of raw material, the technology used to make the tool, function, and discard.
        • Technology can be divided into primary reduction, secondary reduction, and typology.
      • Studying the operational steps provides more awareness of the relationship among the components in the sequence.
        • Choices that are made in one stage affect decisions in another.
        • There is a distinction between expedient and curated tools.
    • Archaeological Thinking: Stone Tools and Hunter-Gatherers in Western Nevada
      • The stone tools of hunter-gatherers in the Carson Sink region of western Nevada were investigated.
        • Archaeological sites occur both at low elevations on the valley floor and at higher elevations in the surrounding mountains.
        • Bifacial artifacts were made and used primarily in the mountains and simple flake tools were more common on the valley floor.
        • At the mountain sites there was a clear difference between sites where bifaces were made or repaired and used as tools and sites where bifaces were used as cores.
    • Refitting
      • Reassembled objects provide a great deal of information about the site and past human activities.
        • Refitting is done with a variety of archaeological materials but most commonly with lithics, pottery, and bone.
        • An example of refitting comes from the late Paleolithic site of Sitra in northwestern Egypt.
    • Archaeological Thinking: How Many Layers?
      • The Lower Paleolithic site of Terra Amata is located on the Mediterranean Coast of France.
        • Stone artifacts and animal bones were found in a series of layers of fossil dunes and beach sand.
        • At the time of the excavation of the site, these different layers were thought to represent many different episodes of human activity at this 250,000 year-old beach site.
        • Based on the refitting study, it appears that there were only 2-3 possible periods of activity at the site rather than many as originally thought
    • Microwear Analysis
      • Microwear analysis and involves the use of microscopes to study the edges of stone tools.
        • This kind of analysis began in the second half of the 20th century.
        • Experimental studies allowed researchers to characterize polishes specific to certain kinds of materials and activities.
        • Stone tools were often used to make other tools of bone, antler, wood, and other materials.

  • Science in Archaeology: Stone Tools and Food
    • A high-powered microscope was used to examine the edges of stone artifacts from the 1.5 million year old site of Koobi Fora in East Africa.
      • Experimental work demonstrated that different materials left different kinds of traces in the form of polish on the edges of tools.
      • About 10% of the flakes had indications of meat cutting, slicing of soft plant material, and the scraping and sawing of wood.

  • Example: The Careful Flintknapper
    • The site called Meer is located in northern Belgium.
      • The site dates to approximately 8000 B.C. and belongs to the very latest Paleolithic in this area.
      • Five distinct clusters of artifacts were recognized on the occupation floor at the site.
      • Sites such as Meer challenge archaeologists to learn something beyond their approximate age based on the kinds of tools that were found.
    • One of the first questions to be answered at Meer was whether the artifacts came from a single episode of residence.
      • Refitting documented the vertical and the horizontal integrity of the site and argued strongly for a single occupation at Meer.
    • The archaeologists believe that different concentrations represent different types of activities.
      • Concentration I at Meer was a living area with more varied daily activities represented.
      • Concentration IV was focused on making bone and antler tools.

  • Other Stone Artifacts
    • There were many uses of stone in prehistory and only some involved shaping stone by flaking to make a useful tool.
      • A variety of techniques were employed to shape stone for various purposes.
      • Blocks of stone were shaped into pieces for construction, into statues, figurines, bowls and other containers, grinding slabs, beads, and many other forms by hammering, pecking, grinding, and polishing.
      • Often a combination of techniques was used to make the final product.







Principles of ArchaeologyOnline Learning Center

Home > Chapter 10 > Chapter Outline