 |
| 1 | |
Ernest Bormann's symbolic convergence theory has both objective and interpretive features. Does it seem to be a better scientific or interpretive theory? Why? |
| | |
|
|
|
| 2 | |
How can we call a scientific theory good if it is capable of being proved wrong? |
| | |
|
|
|
| 3 | |
How can we decide when a rhetorical critic provides a reasonable interpretation? |
| | |
|
|
|
| 4 | |
Any theory involves some trade-offs; no theory can meet every standard of quality equally well. Of the 10 criteria discussed, which is most important to you? Which one is least important? |
| | |
|
|