FOCUS QUESTIONS - What rituals and routines shape classroom
life?
- How is class time related to student
achievement?
- How does the teacher’s gatekeeping
function influence classroom roles?
- What is tracking, and what are its
advantages and disadvantages?
- Why has “detracking” become a
popular movement?
- How do peer groups influence
elementary school life?
- In what ways does the adolescent
culture shape teenage perceptions
and behaviors?
- What impact do changing family patterns
and economic issues have on
children and schools?
- How can educators respond to social
issues that place children at risk?
CHAPTER PREVIEW School is a culture. Like most cultures, it is
filled with its own unique rituals and traditions,
and its own set of norms and mores.
In school, even the familiar, such as time, is
made new. Time is told by subjects (“Let’s
talk before math”) or periods (“I’m going
home after seventh period”). Students
are pinched into passive roles, following
schedules created by others, sitting still
rather than being active, and responding
to teacher questions but seldom asking
any of their own. Such a system challenges
and confines both teachers and students.
Peer groups create friendships and popularity,
a strong subculture that makes winners
and losers of us all—at least for a brief
time. Adults pick up where children leave
off, assigning students to what amounts
to an academic caste system through de
facto tracking or ability grouping. While
adults focus on academics, many adolescents
and preadolescents are focused on
relationships and sexuality. Economic and social factors are also
powerful forces in today’s classrooms, and
have reshaped the family unit. New family
patterns abound, challenging the traditional
view of the mother, father, and two children
(did we forget the dog?) as the “typical”
American family. With these changes, economic
and social problems threaten our
children and challenge teachers. We
will describe these challenges so
that educators can work to create
schools that are safe havens and
institutions of hope. |