Sample analysis of Citizen Kane Sample analysis of Citizen Kane Roger Ebert's analysis of Citizen Kane Considered valid and academic analyses, which of the above analyses discuss the film's structure, the techniques used, and the function for the director's purposeful decisions (the steps outlined in the text for analyzing structure)? In learning about the structure of the film, which analysis is the most helpful in understanding why Citizen Kane is
written, filmed, directed, acted, and edited the way it is? Are any of the
analyses more like a review? Which one is the most scholarly and provides
the best information about style? Read the critical response section of the geocities.com article. What do
you learn about critically analyzing films from reading this? What elements
of criticism are present? How much of the discussion is plot-related? Director-related?
Visually-related? Character-related? Historically-related? Do you think the
response is complete? If you were writing a response of the film, what would
you include in your critical response?
Sample Analysis of Ballet Mecanique What sort of analysis is this article? Where does the author state his
opinion? Where does it rely on previously published analyses of the film?
Where does it incorporate literary theories? Would you consider this a review
of a film? An analysis of style? A scholarly article about a man's work in
the film? How does this article use various styles to analyze the film's
various styles and the work as a whole? What sort of outside references does
the author use to support his ideas? How do these lend credibility to his
analysis? What does the author identify as the intent of the film? How does he arrive
at this conclusion? Do you agree or disagree that this is the intent of the
film? Based on his analysis of the film, would you be interested in viewing
the film? Do you think his analysis will help you to better understand the
film?
|
