When you are
incorporating outside material into your own work (such as for a research
paper) you will need to know how to summarize and how to paraphrase.
In both instances, you are restating someone else's ideas in your own
words. What's the difference? When you summarize, you condense the original
material--you use less words to cover the same idea. When you paraphrase,
you use roughly the same number of words to restate the original idea. The
most important thing to remember, whether you are summarizing or paraphrasing,
is that you must not borrow too much from your original source. You
must use your own words and your own phrasing. If you do not change
enough of the vocabulary and sentence structure of the original passage,
you have plagiarized.
Summarizing
Here's an example
of a summary of a paragraph from Marjorie Garber's essay, "As They Like
It." Read the summary and then answer the questions that follow.
ORIGINAL
The success
of a film called Shakespeare n Love may owe a great deal to its witty script
by playwright Tom Stoppard and screenwriter Marc Norman, as well as to its
personable stars, but not a little of the film's appeal lies in its title.
Who among us would not want a front-row seat or a voyeuristic peephole for
the spectacle of Shakespeare in love, especially if that love is seen to
be the "cause" of his genius?
--Marjorie
Garber, "As They Like It," Harper's Magazine
SUMMARY
In her essay
"As They Like It," Marjorie Garber suggests that the appeal of the film
Shakespeare in Love may have something to do with our desire to see romantic
love as the inspiration for a genius like Shakespeare's.
Paraphrasing
A common mistake
writers make when paraphrasing is to simply substitute synonyms into the
orignal work. Remember that you must alter sentence structure as well. The
following examples will help you to distinguish an acceptable paraphrase
from one that borrows too heavily from the original source. Identify whether
each paraphrase is "OK" or whether it is "Too Close to the Original."
ORIGINAL
Left partially
deaf by a childhood inflammation of the mastoid bones, Thomas Edison throughout
his life embraced the world of silence, reveled in its space, allowed it
to empower him; as much as any man, perhaps, he recognized silence as the
territory of inspiration and cultivated its gifts.
--Mark Slouka,
"Listening for Silence," Harper's Magazine
|
| 1 |
Mark
Slouka, in his article "Listening for Silence," informs us that Thomas
Edison was left partially deaf by a childhood inflammation of the mastoid
bones. Because of this, Slouka says, Edison embraced the world of silence
and reveled in its space. Edison recognized silence as the source of
inspiration and cultivated it. |
|
|
|
OK |
|
|
|
Too Close
to Original |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
Left
hard of hearing by an early problem with the mastoid bones, Thomas Edison
his whole life accepted the realm of silence, enjoyed its isolation,
let it empower him. Mark Slouka, in his article "Listening for Silence,"
claims that as much as anyone, Edison understood silence as the place
of revelation and cultivated its rewards. |
|
|
|
OK |
|
|
|
Too Close
to Original |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
Mark
Slouka, in his article "Listening for Silence," cites Thomas Edison
as an example of a man enriched by his isolation from sound. A childhood
problem had damaged Edisons hearing; instead of feeling crippled,
Edison appreciated the value of quiet. Silence, Slouka explains, was
a necessary source of inspiration for Edison. |
|
|
|
OK |
|
|
|
Too Close
to Original |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|